Project and then only create additional ones when it really makes sense.
#Tee vs eclipse development code#
However - it is usually easier to move code out from a single team project into multiple team projects than it is to go the other way round so my default tends to be to start with one team So basically, my rather unhelpful answer is that "it depends".
But branches do give you some overhead (you have to manage the merging of changes between those branches and deal with any merge conflicts that arrise)Īnother tool is to just have the source code that you need in the various parts of the repository and then use different workspace mappings to bring them into a location on disk locally that make it easy to develop against (for example if you have a commonįramework and then have platform specific code you can map them from totally seperate places in your repository to under a common root on your hard drive for local development or when doing a build). Keil MDK in 2021 by cost, reviews, features, integrations, deployment, target market, support options, trial offers, training options, years in business, region, and more using the chart below. If you have projects that are funded by totally seperateīusiness units with independent teams and independent requirements then it makes sense for them to be seperate team projects.īranches in source control are very useful for allowing parallel development. You can use areas in work item tracking to help distinguish which sub-project tasks etc are related to. Projects then it makes sense for all these projects to be in the same team project. If you have a requirement or feature that would impact multiple Basically it's the work encompassed by a team of people on a common deliverable.
I general rule of thumb that I use is that the scope of a Team Project is "bigger than you think".